SiPM board - Revision history

Simonglm: Simonglm moved page Sipm board to SiPM board without leaving a redirect: Capitalisation

2021-02-09T19:36:54Z

Simonglm moved page Sipm board to SiPM board without leaving a redirect: Capitalisation

Simonglm: Fixed Naming inconsistencies

2021-02-09T19:34:08Z

Fixed Naming inconsistencies

Simonglm: Fixed Layout error

2021-02-09T19:29:22Z

Fixed Layout error

Simonglm: Added SiPM-Type and Link to Datasheet

2021-02-09T19:15:44Z

Added SiPM-Type and Link to Datasheet

Hgz at 13:59, 3 September 2020

2020-09-03T13:59:31Z

Hgz-local at 09:05, 25 June 2020

2020-06-25T09:05:01Z

Wihan at 15:50, 23 June 2020

2020-06-23T15:50:33Z

Wihan at 15:49, 23 June 2020

2020-06-23T15:49:01Z

Wihan at 15:48, 23 June 2020

2020-06-23T15:48:35Z

Wihan at 15:48, 23 June 2020

2020-06-23T15:48:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:34, 9 February 2021
Line 10:		Line 10:


−	Both configurations are quite similar in term of performance, with the hybrid configuration having a slightly faster rising edge (by a few ns <ref>[~~Nies,~~ L.~~, Zaunick~~, H. G., & ~~Brinkmann,~~ K-. T.. Development of a SiPM-based readout-module for the characterization of various scintillator materials. arXiv. (2018). </ref>). The signal amplitude for the hybrid configuration decreases by a factor of <math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}</math> where N the number of SiPM, whereas the signal amplitude does not change for parallel configuration. However, the timing of the parallel configuration also decreases with the number of connected SiPM's; hence, for applications that are very time sensitive, the hybrid configuration might be necessary. Moreover, the hybrid configuration has more complexity, which might make the configuration more expensive to produce. Therefore for simplicity, the ~~Muonpi~~ project uses the parallel configuration. It keeps the simplicity while giving the option for adding SiPM further down the road. The schematic of the SiPM board for the ~~Muon Pi~~ project is shown below.	+	Both configurations are quite similar in term of performance, with the hybrid configuration having a slightly faster rising edge (by a few ns <ref>[L. Nies, H. G. Zaunick, & K.-T. Brinkmann. Development of a SiPM-based readout-module for the characterization of various scintillator materials. arXiv. (2018). </ref>). The signal amplitude for the hybrid configuration decreases by a factor of <math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}</math> where N the number of SiPM, whereas the signal amplitude does not change for parallel configuration. However, the timing of the parallel configuration also decreases with the number of connected SiPM's; hence, for applications that are very time sensitive, the hybrid configuration might be necessary. Moreover, the hybrid configuration has more complexity, which might make the configuration more expensive to produce. Therefore for simplicity, the MuonPi project uses the parallel configuration. It keeps the simplicity while giving the option for adding SiPM further down the road. The schematic of the SiPM board for the MuonPi project is shown below.

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 The circuit configuration of the PCB varies depending on the number of SiPM's it needs to accommodate. For housing a single [https://www.ketek.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/KETEK-PM3325-EB-PM3350-EB-Datasheet.pdf Ketek PM3350-EB] SiPM the configuration is to just connect it with ground and readout/ bias. However, for connecting multiple SiPM's there are two possible configurations: parallel (p) and hybrid (h) configuration as illustrated below.
 [[File:Jepretan Layar 2020-06-23 pukul 4.23.54 PM.png|thumb|Parallel (p) and hybrid (h) configuration of SiPM board <ref>[S. Zimmermann. The panda barrel-tof detector. DPG-Frühjahrstagung, Münster. Austrian Academy of Sciences, Stefan Meyer Insitute for Subatomic Physics, 28th of March, 2017.]</ref>. The signal path is depicted in red, the bias current in green, and the ground in blue.]]
@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 Both configurations are quite similar in term of performance, with the hybrid configuration having a slightly faster rising edge (by a few ns <ref>[Nies, L., Zaunick, H. G., & Brinkmann, K-. T.. Development of a SiPM-based readout-module for the characterization of various scintillator materials. arXiv. (2018). </ref>). The signal amplitude for the hybrid configuration decreases by a factor of <math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}</math> where N the number of SiPM, whereas the signal amplitude does not change for parallel configuration. However, the timing of the parallel configuration also decreases with the number of connected SiPM's; hence, for applications that are very time sensitive, the hybrid configuration might be necessary. Moreover, the hybrid configuration has more complexity, which might make the configuration more expensive to produce. Therefore for simplicity, the Muonpi project uses the parallel configuration. It keeps the simplicity while giving the option for adding SiPM further down the road. The schematic of the SiPM board for the Muon Pi project is shown below.
+<div><ul>
-[[File:SiPMBoard.png| thumb| Schematic of the SiPM board used in the Muonpi project<ref>[L. Nies, “Development of a sipm-based readout-module for the characterization of various scintillation materials (bachelor’s thesis),” (August 2017).]</ref>]]
+<li style="display: inline-block; vertical-align: top;"> [[File:SiPMBoard.png|thumb|none|300px|Schematic of the SiPM board used in the Muonpi project<ref>[L. Nies, “Development of a sipm-based readout-module for the characterization of various scintillation materials (bachelor’s thesis),” (August 2017).]</ref>]] </li>
+<li style="display: inline-block; vertical-align: top;"> [[File:Sipm pcb unmounted.png|thumb|none|300px|Photograph of unmounted SiPM PCB V2.1]] </li>
-[[File:Sipm pcb unmounted.png|left|thumb|Photograph of unmounted SiPM PCB V2.1]]
+<li style="display: inline-block; vertical-align: top;"> [[File:Sipm_pcb_parts.png|thumb|none|300px|Photograph of a mounted SiPM PCB V2.1 with single SiPM (default configuration), rubber spacer and reflective foil]] </li>
-[[File:Sipm_pcb_parts.png|center|thumb|Photograph of a mounted SiPM PCB V2.1 with single SiPM (default configuration), rubber spacer and reflective foil]]
+</ul></div>

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:15, 9 February 2021
Line 4:		Line 4:


−	The circuit configuration of the PCB varies depending on the number of SiPM's it needs to accommodate. For housing a single SiPM the configuration is to just connect it with ground and readout/ bias. However, for connecting multiple SiPM's there are two possible configurations: parallel (p) and hybrid (h) configuration as illustrated below.	+	The circuit configuration of the PCB varies depending on the number of SiPM's it needs to accommodate. For housing a single [https://www.ketek.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/KETEK-PM3325-EB-PM3350-EB-Datasheet.pdf Ketek PM3350-EB] SiPM the configuration is to just connect it with ground and readout/ bias. However, for connecting multiple SiPM's there are two possible configurations: parallel (p) and hybrid (h) configuration as illustrated below.

	[[File:Jepretan Layar 2020-06-23 pukul 4.23.54 PM.png\|thumb\|Parallel (p) and hybrid (h) configuration of SiPM board <ref>[S. Zimmermann. The panda barrel-tof detector. DPG-Frühjahrstagung, Münster. Austrian Academy of Sciences, Stefan Meyer Insitute for Subatomic Physics, 28th of March, 2017.]</ref>. The signal path is depicted in red, the bias current in green, and the ground in blue.]]		[[File:Jepretan Layar 2020-06-23 pukul 4.23.54 PM.png\|thumb\|Parallel (p) and hybrid (h) configuration of SiPM board <ref>[S. Zimmermann. The panda barrel-tof detector. DPG-Frühjahrstagung, Münster. Austrian Academy of Sciences, Stefan Meyer Insitute for Subatomic Physics, 28th of March, 2017.]</ref>. The signal path is depicted in red, the bias current in green, and the ground in blue.]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:59, 3 September 2020
Line 17:		Line 17:

	[[File:Sipm pcb unmounted.png\|left\|thumb\|Photograph of unmounted SiPM PCB V2.1]]		[[File:Sipm pcb unmounted.png\|left\|thumb\|Photograph of unmounted SiPM PCB V2.1]]
		+	[[File:Sipm_pcb_parts.png\|center\|thumb\|Photograph of a mounted SiPM PCB V2.1 with single SiPM (default configuration), rubber spacer and reflective foil]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:05, 25 June 2020
Line 15:		Line 15:

	[[File:SiPMBoard.png\| thumb\| Schematic of the SiPM board used in the Muonpi project<ref>[L. Nies, “Development of a sipm-based readout-module for the characterization of various scintillation materials (bachelor’s thesis),” (August 2017).]</ref>]]		[[File:SiPMBoard.png\| thumb\| Schematic of the SiPM board used in the Muonpi project<ref>[L. Nies, “Development of a sipm-based readout-module for the characterization of various scintillation materials (bachelor’s thesis),” (August 2017).]</ref>]]
		+
		+	[[File:Sipm pcb unmounted.png\|left\|thumb\|Photograph of unmounted SiPM PCB V2.1]]

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:36, 9 February 2021
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:50, 23 June 2020
Line 10:		Line 10:


−	Both configurations are quite similar in term of performance, with the hybrid configuration having a slightly faster rising edge (by a few ns <ref>[Nies, L., Zaunick, H. G., & Brinkmann, K-. T.. Development of a SiPM-based readout-module for the characterization of various scintillator materials. arXiv. (2018). </ref>). The signal amplitude for the hybrid configuration decreases by a factor of <math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}</math> where N the number of SiPM, whereas the signal amplitude does not change for parallel configuration. ~~Moreover~~, the timing of the parallel configuration also decreases with the number of connected SiPM's~~. Hence~~ for applications that are very time sensitive, the hybrid configuration might be necessary. ~~However~~ the hybrid configuration has more complexity, which might make the configuration more expensive to produce. Therefore for simplicity, the Muonpi project uses the parallel configuration ~~is suitable for the Muonpi project as it~~ keeps the simplicity while giving the option for adding SiPM further down the road. The schematic of the SiPM board for the Muon Pi project is shown below.	+	Both configurations are quite similar in term of performance, with the hybrid configuration having a slightly faster rising edge (by a few ns <ref>[Nies, L., Zaunick, H. G., & Brinkmann, K-. T.. Development of a SiPM-based readout-module for the characterization of various scintillator materials. arXiv. (2018). </ref>). The signal amplitude for the hybrid configuration decreases by a factor of <math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}</math> where N the number of SiPM, whereas the signal amplitude does not change for parallel configuration. However, the timing of the parallel configuration also decreases with the number of connected SiPM's; hence, for applications that are very time sensitive, the hybrid configuration might be necessary. Moreover, the hybrid configuration has more complexity, which might make the configuration more expensive to produce. Therefore for simplicity, the Muonpi project uses the parallel configuration. It keeps the simplicity while giving the option for adding SiPM further down the road. The schematic of the SiPM board for the Muon Pi project is shown below.



	[[File:SiPMBoard.png\| thumb\| Schematic of the SiPM board used in the Muonpi project<ref>[L. Nies, “Development of a sipm-based readout-module for the characterization of various scintillation materials (bachelor’s thesis),” (August 2017).]</ref>]]		[[File:SiPMBoard.png\| thumb\| Schematic of the SiPM board used in the Muonpi project<ref>[L. Nies, “Development of a sipm-based readout-module for the characterization of various scintillation materials (bachelor’s thesis),” (August 2017).]</ref>]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:49, 23 June 2020
Line 10:		Line 10:


−	Both configurations are quite similar in term of performance, with the hybrid configuration having a slightly faster rising edge (by a few ns <ref>[Nies, L., Zaunick, H. G., & Brinkmann, K-. T.. Development of a SiPM-based readout-module for the characterization of various scintillator materials. arXiv. (2018). </ref>). The signal amplitude for the hybrid configuration decreases by a factor of <math>frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}</math> where N the number of SiPM, whereas the signal amplitude does not change for parallel configuration. Moreover, the timing of the parallel configuration also decreases with the number of connected SiPM's. Hence for applications that are very time sensitive, the hybrid configuration might be necessary. However the hybrid configuration has more complexity, which might make the configuration more expensive to produce. Therefore for simplicity, the Muonpi project uses the parallel configuration is suitable for the Muonpi project as it keeps the simplicity while giving the option for adding SiPM further down the road. The schematic of the SiPM board for the Muon Pi project is shown below.	+	Both configurations are quite similar in term of performance, with the hybrid configuration having a slightly faster rising edge (by a few ns <ref>[Nies, L., Zaunick, H. G., & Brinkmann, K-. T.. Development of a SiPM-based readout-module for the characterization of various scintillator materials. arXiv. (2018). </ref>). The signal amplitude for the hybrid configuration decreases by a factor of <math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}</math> where N the number of SiPM, whereas the signal amplitude does not change for parallel configuration. Moreover, the timing of the parallel configuration also decreases with the number of connected SiPM's. Hence for applications that are very time sensitive, the hybrid configuration might be necessary. However the hybrid configuration has more complexity, which might make the configuration more expensive to produce. Therefore for simplicity, the Muonpi project uses the parallel configuration is suitable for the Muonpi project as it keeps the simplicity while giving the option for adding SiPM further down the road. The schematic of the SiPM board for the Muon Pi project is shown below.



	[[File:SiPMBoard.png\| thumb\| Schematic of the SiPM board used in the Muonpi project<ref>[L. Nies, “Development of a sipm-based readout-module for the characterization of various scintillation materials (bachelor’s thesis),” (August 2017).]</ref>]]		[[File:SiPMBoard.png\| thumb\| Schematic of the SiPM board used in the Muonpi project<ref>[L. Nies, “Development of a sipm-based readout-module for the characterization of various scintillation materials (bachelor’s thesis),” (August 2017).]</ref>]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:48, 23 June 2020
Line 10:		Line 10:


−	Both configurations are quite similar in term of performance, with the hybrid configuration having a slightly faster rising edge (by a few ns <ref>[Nies, L., Zaunick, H. G., & Brinkmann, K-. T.. Development of a SiPM-based readout-module for the characterization of various scintillator materials. arXiv. (2018). </ref>). The signal amplitude for the hybrid configuration decreases by a factor of <math>~~\gamma = \~~frac{1}{N}</math> where N the number of SiPM, whereas the signal amplitude does not change for parallel configuration. Moreover, the timing of the parallel configuration also decreases with the number of connected SiPM's. Hence for applications that are very time sensitive, the hybrid configuration might be necessary. However the hybrid configuration has more complexity, which might make the configuration more expensive to produce. Therefore for simplicity, the Muonpi project uses the parallel configuration is suitable for the Muonpi project as it keeps the simplicity while giving the option for adding SiPM further down the road. The schematic of the SiPM board for the Muon Pi project is shown below.	+	Both configurations are quite similar in term of performance, with the hybrid configuration having a slightly faster rising edge (by a few ns <ref>[Nies, L., Zaunick, H. G., & Brinkmann, K-. T.. Development of a SiPM-based readout-module for the characterization of various scintillator materials. arXiv. (2018). </ref>). The signal amplitude for the hybrid configuration decreases by a factor of <math>frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}</math> where N the number of SiPM, whereas the signal amplitude does not change for parallel configuration. Moreover, the timing of the parallel configuration also decreases with the number of connected SiPM's. Hence for applications that are very time sensitive, the hybrid configuration might be necessary. However the hybrid configuration has more complexity, which might make the configuration more expensive to produce. Therefore for simplicity, the Muonpi project uses the parallel configuration is suitable for the Muonpi project as it keeps the simplicity while giving the option for adding SiPM further down the road. The schematic of the SiPM board for the Muon Pi project is shown below.



	[[File:SiPMBoard.png\| thumb\| Schematic of the SiPM board used in the Muonpi project<ref>[L. Nies, “Development of a sipm-based readout-module for the characterization of various scintillation materials (bachelor’s thesis),” (August 2017).]</ref>]]		[[File:SiPMBoard.png\| thumb\| Schematic of the SiPM board used in the Muonpi project<ref>[L. Nies, “Development of a sipm-based readout-module for the characterization of various scintillation materials (bachelor’s thesis),” (August 2017).]</ref>]]